Well, the A's apparently have made a strong offer to Ben Sheets and are hoping to hear back from his cam today or tomorrow with a decision. Is it me or does this sound like the theme of the winter? The Mets will undoubtedly be outbid for another player, and will subsequently talk about how they aren't thrilled with the free agent class this off season and how they have a plan and will move forward. Blah, Blah, Blah. First, let me say that I am not saying Ben Sheets will win 20 games and be the comeback player of the year and will win us the World Series. All I am saying is that from my standpoint, it seems like a cost effective, low risk move, signing Ben Sheets for a year, maybe a second if absolutely necessary. Here are the reasons:
- He is a a number 1 starter. His stuff, makeup, and intensity all show that. He would give the Mets a 1-2 punch that would be at least as good, if not better than, the Phillies' Halladay/Hamels tandem.
- Sheets is an affordable option in the market. He is very likely to sign for under $10 million for the year. There are a lot of pitchers in the league (even on the team-OP) making more that aren't half the pitcher he is. It is a short term commitment that would not handcuff the team like a 3-4 year deal would for someone else of his caliber.
- The final reason is the KEY. He makes the whole staff better. By slotting into the two hole behind Santana, he shoves everyone else down a notch. Suddenly, Maine and Perez are pitching against 3 and 4's now and they can compete against these guys. Maine and Perez and not 2 & 3's. If you sign Washburn, Garland, even Smoltz, where do they slot? Not in front of Maine/Perez. So, in effect, you are making it more difficult for them as well.
oh, I really like the style of your writing!
Posted by: UGGs | November 01, 2011 at 07:10 PM
I received my first loan when I was 20 and that supported my family a lot. However, I require the car loan once more time.
Posted by: HebertRachel | December 26, 2011 at 08:07 AM