There has been a lot of banter this week regarding Johan Santana's elbow and where his season is headed. Although I do not have access to his medical information nor do I speak to team doctors or front office, I will offer my opinion. Opening Day 2009 is not important for Johan Santana to pitch. Why? Am I just being cautious for the rest of the season? No. I am concerned about his full contract/career. The Mets have a lot invested in Santana and he is only going to turn 30 next Friday, March 13th. However, he has already thrown over 1500 innings. He has five straight years of 219 innings or more, plus playoffs.
Give me a break if I seem a little more worried about the future years as opposed to Opening Day 2009. I am thinking about 2010, 2011, 2012, etc. Santana can be the face of this pitching staff for several years if handled correctly.
Here are two better options in my opinion:
Option 1- Have Santana make his season debut starting the April 10th game in Florida. A nice warm first start in the same atmosphere as spring training, he could even stay in Florida and not travel to Cincy for the opening series. Warm weather, loose muscles. Plus it is those annoying Marlins.
Option 2- How about Santana starts the home opener at Citi Field? Right now, if he opens the season, he is not the Citi Field opening day pitcher. How cool would that be to start off the new home with Santana pitching? Talk about an intense atmosphere. Otherwise, who starts that game? The way the schedule looks, probably Perez. So, if he does, do you get a 2 hit shutout or a 2 inning blowup to open Citi Field? At least with Santana, you can assume he will rise to the occasion.
Anyway it shakes out, Santana is not important for opening day, he is important for his career. Let's remember that.







I have the same take on the whole Santana situation.
I think it may be cool to hold Santana back to pitch the 1st game at CitiField.
Let's face it, Santana or no Santana the Mets are awesome on Opening Day historically, and they are playing one of the weaker teams in the NL, Cincy.
If he is good to go, then so be it... but don't put him out there if there is a chance it will come back to bite him in June or July.
Posted by: MikeS | March 08, 2009 at 09:32 PM
ok
Posted by: sam | March 25, 2009 at 02:49 AM
I agree with you when you consider the big picture and total innings he has thrown. Look at the Diamondbacks Brandon Webb. A low risk pitcher because he does not throw exceedingly hard, yet he is on the dl because of the use he has had the past few years. People may want to temper their expectations.
Posted by: colorado bankruptcy attorney | April 29, 2009 at 11:21 PM